Logistics
and supply chain management are not new ideas. From the building of the
pyramids to the relief of hunger in Africa there has been little change to the principles
underpinning the effective flow of materials and information to meet the requirements
of customers.
Throughout
the history of mankind, wars have been won and lost through logistics‘
strengths and capabilities – or the lack of them. It has been argued that the defeat
of the British in the American War of Independence can largely be attributed to
logistics failures. The British Army in America depended almost entirely upon Britain
for supplies; at the height of the war there were 12,000 troops overseas and
for the most part they had not only to be equipped, but fed from Britain. For the
first six years of the war the administration of these vital supplies was
totally inadequate, affecting the course of operations and the morale of the
troops. An organisation capable of supplying the army was not developed until
1781 and by then it was too late.
In the Second World War logistics
also played a major role. The Allied Forces’ invasion of Europe was a highly
skilled exercise in logistics, as was the defeat of Rommel in the desert.
Rommel himself once said that “Before the fighting proper, the battle is won or
lost by quartermasters”.
No comments:
Post a Comment